Patna High CourtL.P.A/2/2020withdrawn

M/S Sahil Projects Prachi (Jv) v. The Union Of India

2021-10-28The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice A. M. Badar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21236 of 2019 ====================================================== M/s Sahil Projects Prachi (JV) a Partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 having its registered Office at 104, Sachhi Palace, Sahdeo Mahto Marg, Boring Road, Patna, Bihar through its authorized representative Shri. Brajesh Mishra, Son of Jangbahadur Mishra, aged about 46 Years. Gender-male, Retisent of 104, Sachhi Palace, sahdeo Mahto Marg, Boring Road, Patna, Bihar.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, having its Office at Mahendru Ghat, 1st Floor, Patna-800004. 2.

The Chief Administrative Officer (Con), Mahendru Ghat, 1st Floor, Patna800004. 3.

The Chief Engineer (Con)/North, East Central Railway (Construction Organization), Mahendru Ghat, 1st Floor, Patna-800004. 4.

The Deputy Chief Engineer (Con/1), East Central Railway (Construction Organization), Samastipur.

The Executive Enginer(Con), Saharsha.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Lal Babu Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. M. BADAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-10-2021 This appeal is directed against the judgment/order dated 19.11.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 21236 of 2019, titled as M/s Sahil Projects- Prachi (JV) Vs. The Union of India & Ors., by a learned Single Bench of this Court. Learned counsel for the appellant does not press the

Patna High Court L.P.A No.2 of 2020(3) dt.28-10-2021 2/2 appeal, reserving liberty to take recourse to remedies as provided under the contract, in accordance with law. Prayer allowed.

The appeal is dismissed as not pressed, with the liberty aforesaid.

It stands clarified that the period for which the appellant has been pursuing the appeal before this Court shall not be account for the purpose of limitation. Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( A. M. Badar, J) K.C.Jha/DKS/- U