Rajeshwar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4105 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2006 Thana -SIMRA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Rajeshwar Mahto Son of Lila Mahto Resident of Village - Daya Don Jigrahani, P.S. - Gobarahiya, District - West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.M.P.Sinha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 30-01-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 15.04.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 342, 395, 427, 436, 452, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of Arms Act, 3/4 of Explosive Substances Act and 17 of Criminal Law Amendment Act.
The accusation is of committing dacoity in the house of S.I. of Police by 40-50 unknown Maoist. The name of the petitioner sprang up during investigation. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was one of the such persons, who
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4105 of 2015 (02) dt.30-01-2015 2/2 committed the dacoity. Statement has been made in para 6 of the petition that neither any recovery has been made from the petitioner nor the petitioner has been put on TIP. Petitioner is accused in one other case apart from present one. Considering the fact that the petitioner has not been put on TIP, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge Ist, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Sessions Trial No. 332 of 2014 arising out of Semra (Chiutaha) P.S. Case No. 36 of 2006.
The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in some serious nature of the offence or defaults for two consecutive occasions.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) DKS/- U T