← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/973/2017disposed

Shiv Prasad Raut And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-04-30Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.973 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Shiv Prasad Raut and Ors Son of Late Fakan Raut, Resident of VillageRupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 2.

Chitranjan Rai, 3.

Shree Narayan Rai.

4.

Moti Lal Rai @ Moti Rai.

5.

Upendra Rai, 6.

Hiralal Rai, All Son of Chetharu Rai, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S. Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 7.

Beena Devi, Wife of Shiv Prasad Raut, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S. Fenhara, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner-cum-Secretary land Reform, Old Secretariate, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran.

4.

The Additional District Magistrate, Land Reforms, East Champaran. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, East Champaran. 6.

The Circle Officer, Block- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 7.

Kirti Ram, Son of Mannu Ram.

8.

Bhagirath Ram, Son of Suruj Ram, 9.

Meghu Ram, Son of Rajeshwar Ram, 10.

Chandra Deo Ram, Son of Budhu Ram, Respondent no. 7 to 10 are Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha- SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-04-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for grant of following relief/s:-

Patna High Court CWJC No.973 of 2017(2) dt.30-04-2024 2/2 "For issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of certiorari for setting aside the draft statement of Block-Fenhara, District- East Champaran issued by the Circle Officer, Block-Fenhara, District-East Champaran (Respondent No.-6)"

3. A perusal of the prayer would show that only a draft statement made in the Block- Fenhara, District- East Champaran has been challenged.

4. There is no supplementary affidavit to show what happened thereafter.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be approaching the concerned authority.

6. Granting said liberty, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U