Gyanendra Kumar @ Tinku v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2345 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Gyanendra Kumar @ Tinku S/O Prabhakar Kumar @ Prabhakar Shah R/O Village- Basaha, P.s.- Bajpatti , District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that 7 unknown miscreants have entered in the house of the informant and took away valuable articles from the house of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation Md. Nizam and Amit Kumar have named this petitioner in their confessional statement. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2345 of 2026(2) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 further submitted that Amit Kumar has been granted bail by the learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 40583 of 2025 (with Cr. Misc No. 43026 of 2025) whereas Md. Nizam has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 84812 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Save and except the confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner.

5.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail submitting that the petitioner has seven criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall mark his attendance weekly in Bajpatti P.S. failing which his bail bond will be cancelled. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Jale P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-1st, Darbhanga.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T