Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4518/2015bail granted

Vikash Kumar Pandey @ Manjit v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-03Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4518 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -538 Year- 2014 Thana -GOPALGANJ CITY District- GOPALGANJ ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Pandey @ Manjit son of Late Kanhaiya Pandey R/o Manjhi South Tola, P.S. - Manjhi, District- Chapra (Saran.) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 03-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420/ 379/ 34/414 of IPC. It is submitted that the petitioner has gone to take money from ATM machine. In the meantime, the informant raised alarm and he was apprehended on the spot. He disclosed the name of the persons who had taken away the ATM card of the informant. There is no allegation that the petitioner has withdrawn any money from the account of the informant.

It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 2.12.2014 having no criminal antecedent. The police

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4518 of 2015 (2) dt.03-02-2015 2/2 has already filed charge-sheet against the petitioner and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A. C. J. M., Gopalganj/court concerned in Gopalganj P. S. Case No. 538 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T