Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13559/2017bail granted

Bhola Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13559 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -369 Year- 2016 Thana -MOTIHARI MUFASIL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Bhola Mahto S/O Late Narsing Mahto R.O Village Rupadih P.S.- Motihari Mufasil District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhannjay Kumar No 2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Motihari Mucasil P.S.Case No.369 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 & 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and he is father-in-law. He is in custody since 26.09.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that the petitioner is father-in-law and there is no specific allegation as well as he has remained in custody for about six months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Motihari, East

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13559 of 2017 (2) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 Champaran at Motihari in connection with Motihari Mufasil P.S.Case No.369 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U