← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12438/2021dfd for non appearance

Javaharlal Prasad @ Jawaharlal Prasad @ Javahar Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12438 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2006 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Javaharlal Prasad @ Jawaharlal Prasad @ Javahar Lal Sah S/o Aniruddha Sah, R/o Village-Baletha, P.S.-SIWAN Mufassil, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Hari Narayan Prasad Son of Late Anirudh Prasad, Resident of Village - Sah Batltha, Gadhpatti, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Distt.- Siwan. 3.

Dilip Prasad Son of Hari Narayan Prasad, Resident of Village - Sah Batltha, Gadhpatti, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Distt.- Siwan. 4.

Munna Prasad Son of Hari Narayan Prasad, Resident of Village - Sah Batltha, Gadhpatti, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Distt.- Siwan. 5.

Ashok Prasad Son of Hari Naryan Prasad, Resident of Village - Sah Batltha, Gadhpatti, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Distt.- Siwan. 6.

Sushil Prasad Son of Hari Narayan Prasad, Resident of Village - Sah Batltha, Gadhpatti, P.S.- Siwan Muffasil, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP.

For the O.P. No.2 to 6 :

Mr. Satyendra Rai, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 No one appears on behalf of petitioners.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 to 6 appeared and filed counter affidavit. On 07.12.2022 no one appeared on behalf of petitioner. As a last indulgence this case was adjourned for 20.12.2022 and it was directed that if no one appears on behalf of petitioner on the date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also on repeated calls, no one appears on behalf

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12438 of 2021(5) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 of petitioner.

It transpires that learned counsel for the petitioner has lost interest in the case and as such, this case is dismissed for non prosecution.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U T