Dheeru Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1143 of 2021 ====================================================== Dheeru Yadav, Son of Laxman Singh Yadav, R/o Type 2 house No.9, Mandi Samitit, Roza, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh-242406, Presently at-2/23, Boys Hostel 3, Panjab University, Sector 14, Chandigarh-160014 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bihar Public Service Commission through the Chairman, 15, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg (Bailey Road) Patna, Bihar-800001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Pravashankar Mishra, Advocate For the Commission :

Mr.Lalit Kishore, Senior Advocate Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-02-2021 Upon instructions Mr. Lalit Kishore, learned Senior Counsel informs this Court that pursuant to the query yesterday, the Bihar Public Service Commission has agreed to allow the petitioner's participation in the re-examination being conducted on 14.02.2021 for the 66th Combined Competitive BPSC Examination.

Learned Senior Counsel submits that without admitting to the allegations made by the petitioner and in view of the fact that the petitioner is visually impaired, he shall be extended the facility of a scribe and extra time, as per the guidelines of the State of Bihar, in this regard, issued by the General Administration Department dated 12.10.2017.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1143 of 2021(5) dt.12-02-2021 2/2 The grievance of the petitioner therefore stands redressed.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be participating in the Examination.

The learned Senior Counsel submits that since concession has been given in view of the fact that a reexamination is already scheduled on 14.02.2021, the matter should not be treated as a precedent.

This Court would observe that having regard to the reexamination already fixed and in view of the unique situation the concession has been granted, there is no adjudication or decision on merits of the rival submissions. Therefore this order may not be treated as a precedent.

Learned State Counsel is also appearing through virtual mode.

The writ application stands disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U