← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5111/2015dismissed

Guddu Jha @ Uttam Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-30Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5111 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2014 Thana -BAUNSI District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Guddu Jha @ Uttam Jha Son of Munna Jha @ Satya Prakash Jha Resident of village- Golhatti, P.S- Bounsi, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N.Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 Heard Sri B.P. Pandey, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned APP. The petitioner seeks bail in Bounsi P.S.Case No. 82 of 2014 registered under Sections 304B, 120B and 34 IPC. The petitioner is the husband of the deceased. The mother of the deceased made allegation that the petitioner and his wife went to sleep in their room but in the next morning, her daughter was fond dead.

Shri Pandey, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, submitted that there was no bitter relation between husband and wife. Three injuries were found on the body of the deceased but those injuries can not be said to be cause of death. The doctor could not ascertain the cause of death.

Viscera report has not come.

From perusal of the Post Mortem Report, it appears that the deceased got five injuries. The petitioner and his wife were sleeping in the room and in the next morning, the dead body of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5111 of 2015 (4) dt.30-04-2015 deceased was found.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, the same is rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of nine month from the date of receipt or production of a copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) ahk/- U T