← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11911/2021allowed

Md. Majid Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-14Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11911 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-934 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== MD. MAJID ALAM Son of Md. Wasi Ahmad Resident of Village - Alinagar, P.S. - Alinagar, District - Darbhanga, At Present residing at VillageMusanagar Airport, P.S. - Town, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

KHUSHNAM PRAVEEN Wife of Md. Majid Alam Resident of Musanagar Airport, P.S. - Town, District - Madubani, At Present Daughter of Md. Naeem, resident of Kheribanka, P.S. - Bisfi, O.P. - Onsi, District - Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratanakar Jha, Advocate.

For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate. For the State :

Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 341, 504 & 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no2., is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11911 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 2/2 demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with C.R. Case No.

934/2019 corresponding to T.R. No.480/2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C., If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.