Ravindra Acharya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1859 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2019 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR DistrictPurnia ====================================================== 1.

RAVINDRA ACHARYA Son of Bindhwasi Acharya Resident of Village- Sat Kodariya, P.S.- K. Nagar (Maranga), District- Purnea. 2.

Munni Devi W/o Ravindra Acharya Resident of Village- Sat Kodariya, P.S.- K. Nagar (Maranga), District- Purnea.

3.

Khusbu Devi W/o Rajesh Goswami Resident of Village- Sat Kodariya, P.S.- K. Nagar (Maranga), District- Purnea.

4.

Rajesh Goswami Son of Ravindra Acharya Resident of Village- Sat Kodariya, P.S.- K. Nagar (Maranga), District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 147, 341, 323, 379, 325, 354, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioners assaulted the informant's side by means of deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries. It is further alleged that one Munni Devi inflicted dagger injury on the arm of husband of the informant and looted the house-hold articles. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1859 of 2022(3) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter-case between the parties. In the alleged occurrence both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as also mentioned in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and after perusal of the injury report it is evident that the the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in K.Nagar (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 331 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T