Shashi Bhushan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4469 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2022 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Shashi Bhushan Prasad S/O Rampal Prasad R/O Village- Mayapur, P.SKatrisarai, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umeshanand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and section 66(c) of the I.T. Act.
3. As per allegation in the FIR, on getting secret information about cheating of innocent people by way of cheating crime, police party raided the place and accused Manoj Kumar was apprehended and rest of the accused persons managed to escape. Fom his possession, 2 mobile sets, 8 order sheets of different companies, Aadhar Card, voter card, Pan Card of different persons, cash of Rs. 1300/- and one motorcycle were recovered from his possession. He disclosed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4469 of 2024(2) dt.08-02-2024 2/3 the name of 13 other accused persons including the name of the petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is farmer and he has no concern with the apprehended accused person. He was not apprehended on spot. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Save and except, confessional statement of apprehended accused Manoj Kumar, nothing has come against the petitioner to show his complicity in the present case. Manoj Kumar, co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by another coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.11.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21062 of 2022. Petitioner is in custody since 4.11.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Biharsharif at Nalanda in connection with Giriyak
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4469 of 2024(2) dt.08-02-2024 3/3 (Katrisarai) P.S. Case No. 86 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U