Bablu Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12325 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2020 Thana- FULKAHA District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Bablu Sharma Son of Sri Narayan Sharma Resident of Village - Bhawanipur, Ward No. 05, P.S. - Fulkaha, Dist. - Araria.

2.

Pappu Sharma Son of Kalanand Sharma Resident of Village- Farhi, P.S. Narpatganj, Dist. - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-06-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners pray for grant of bail in Fulkaha P.S. Case no.97 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, on 01.09.2020 at 3 pm, the informant along with his nephew boarding on tractor trolley loaded with wheat and rice went to deliver it to dealer Raj Kumar and after uploading the wheat and rice when they were returning, these petitioners and others on the point of pistol snatched Rs 2000/-.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12325 of 2021(2) dt.29-06-2021 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to village politics. It is further submitted that falsity of the case is more evident from the fact that Rs 2000/- has been looted on the point of gun. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. It is further alleged that compromise has already been made between the parties. Petitioners are in custody since 02.09.2020.

However, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that it is case of robbery and petitioners have been apprehended on the spot while committing robbery.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T