Radhe Shyam Ram @ Sri Radhe Shyam Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5027 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2014 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Radhe Shyam Ram @ Sri Radhe Shyam Ram Son of Late Hira Lal Ram resident of village - Giridhar Baraun, Police Station Sonbarsa, Nawanagar, District - Buxar, Presently Assistant Teacher and Ex - Headmaster, Utkramit Madhya Vidyalay, Hakarpur, Police Station Rajpur, District - Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 05-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 409, 420 of IPC. Allegation against the petitioner is that while he was posted as Headmaster of Utkramit Madhya Vidyalay, Hankarpur, fund was allotted for construction of chamber for the headmaster and other construction. The money for construction of the chamber of Headmaster was withdrawn by the petitioner to the tune of Rs.2,08,013/- but the work has not been completed as such he has defalcated the government money.

It is submitted that the petitioner will complete the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5027 of 2015 (2) dt.05-02-2015 2/2 work allotted to him for which money was withdrawn. He has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar/court concerned in Rajpur P. S. Case No. 134 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T