Bablu Yadav @ Babblu Yadav@Wablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1833 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2022 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Bablu Yadav @ Babblu Yadav@Wablu Yadav S/O Musafir Yadav @ Mosafir Yadav Resident of Village- Chirayantad, P.S.- Chandauti, DistrictGaya, 2.
Deepak Yadav @ Deepak Kumar Son of Musafir Yadav @ Mosafir Yadav Resident of Village- Chirayantad, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya, 3.
Rajesh Yadav @ Rajesh Kumar Son of Musafir Yadav @ Mosafir Yadav Resident of Village- Chirayantad, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya, 4.
Musafir Yadav @ Mosafir Yadav Son of Late Budhan Yadav Resident of Village- Chirayantad, P.S.- Chandauti, District- Gaya, ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The informant alleged that when she along with other family members were erecting boundary wall on their field, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including petitioners came and assaulted informant and her family members.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1833 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/2 account of land dispute, the alleged scuffle took place. He further submits that there is no injury report on record to substantiate the allegation made in the F.I.R. Petitioner no. 1, 2 & 4 claim clean antecedent, whereas petitioner no. 3 has got one criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate - III, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 354 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. / Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T