Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24962/2016rejected

Banti Gorhi @ Banti Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2016-06-29Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24962 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24962 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -38 Year- 2013 Thana -BHAGALPUR GRP CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Banti Gorhi @ Banti Mandal Son of Bishwanath Gorhi @ Bishwanath Mandal Resident of village- Adarsh Nagar, Jichho Pokhar, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sangita Sharma (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 30.10.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 23154 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2014 and up-till-now charges have not been framed, resulting, in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that during investigation it has come that the petitioner is the assailant.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again his prayer for bail in S. T. No. 634 of 2015 ( c )

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24962 of 2016 (2) dt.29-06-2016 arising out of Bhagalpur Rail P.S. Case No. 38 of 2013 pending in the court of learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Bhagalpur stands rejected.

However, considering the period of detention of the petitioner, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T