Pramila Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1900 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2021 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.
Pramila Devi Wife Of Raj Kumar Panda Resident Of Village- Panda Mohalla, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. 2.
Raj Kumar Panda Son of Late Ramnath Panda Resident of Village- Panda Mohalla, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that initially, the a U.D. case was registered for the death of Mangal Panda wherein mother of the deceased who is petitioner No. 1 before this Court has stated that her son committed suicide by hanging himself because her daughter-in-law went to her maternal house without
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1900 of 2022(3) dt.27-07-2022 2/3 giving information to anyone. During investigation, the wife and father-in-law of the deceased have alleged against the petitioners and their daughter that they have killed the deceased by continuously assaulting him. The postmortem report also suggested the injuries on the head of the deceased.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that for the alleged occurrence of 07.07.2020, the present F.I.R has been registered on 14.09.2021 without explaining the delay. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. There is also no material evidence against the petitioners. Learned A.P.P appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and stated that the deceased's wife and father-in-law have supported the prosecution case. However, it is the admitted fact that there is no direct evidence against the petitioners.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1900 of 2022(3) dt.27-07-2022 3/3 In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 225 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T