Kalawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1521 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-804 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Kalawati Devi Wife of Arun Ray Resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran 2.
Hari Ray Son of Binda Ray Resident of Village- Narayanpur, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Danish Raja , Advocate For the State :
Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Advocate Ms. Chhateshwari Kumari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these two petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members with iron rod, dab and sword.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1521 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are co-villagers and due to long standing land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries allegedly caused by these petitioners and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1521 of 2026(3) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 804 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T