Ashok Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through Home Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.349 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2017 Thana- BRAHMPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Ashok Kumar, son of Late Satyadeo Prasad 2.

Poonam Verma @ Poonam Kumari, wife of Ashok Kumar 3.

Saurav Kumar, son of Ashok Kumar, 4.

Alok Ranjan @ Alok Kumar, son of Rajani Ranjan Srivastava 5.

Garima @ Annu, wife of Alok Ranjan @ Alok Kumar, Petitioner No. 1,2,3 resident of Mohalla- Majhaulia Road, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, District Muzaffarpur at present Pawanputra Apartment, Flat No. 301, Frazer Road, Near B.S.H.C. Building, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna and petitioner No. 4 and 5, resident of D.V.C. Colony, Maithan, P.S.- Maithan, District- Dhanbad, Jharkhand.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, Through Home Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna, Bihar 2.

S.P. Muzaffarpur, Tirhut Range, Bihar.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan, SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-12-2025 The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR bearing Brahmpur P.S Case No.281 of 2017 arising out of Complaint Case No.2497 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 498(A), 406, 327, 354, 354(B), 376, 511, 342, 324, 306, 120(B) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. However, as per report from the Court below in the said FIR, investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been submitted and even cognizance has been taken and the case is at

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.349 of 2018(6) dt.08-12-2025 2/2 the stage of framing of charge.

3. Hence, after some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner is seeking withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to raise objection during the hearing on the point of framing of charge.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioner to raise objection during hearing on the point of charge.

(Jitendra Kumar, J.) Chandan/- U T