Arvind Sahani @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2377 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2025 Thana- BALIGAON District- Vaishali ====================================================== Arvind Sahani @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Sahani S/o- Tarun Sahani R/v- W.No-12, Haripur Ghat, Ps- Khanpur Dist- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 06 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that informant while returning home on his motorcycle in the meantime, on the way, three unknown miscreants riding on motorcycle over took him from behind. They pulled out the key and hit him. When he fell down, they ran away with his motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2377 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/3 the co-accused Suman Saurabh. No incriminating/looted article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that Charge-sheet has been submitted. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date to ascertain the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025 and has 17 criminal antecedents. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 06 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2377 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the Trial Court will have the liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T