Shatrudhan Mishra v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principle Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.9 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7982 of 2022 ====================================================== Shatrudhan Mishra S/o Badan Mishra Resident of Village- Balthar, P.S.- Balthar, Dist.- West Champaran Bettiah.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Principle Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah. 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran.

6.

The Circle Officer, Sikta, District- West Champaran. 7.

The S.H.O., Balthar Police Station, District- West Champaran. 8.

Naresh Prasad, Son of Sodhi Prasad Resident of Village- Balthar, Police Station- Balthar, District- West Champaran Bettiah. 9.

Seth Sah, Son of Jamadar Sah Resident of Village- Balthar, Police StationBalthar, District- West Champaran Bettiah. 10.

Jitendra Sah, Son of Jamadar Sah Resident of Village- Balthar, Police Station- Balthar, District- West Champaran Bettiah. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam (Aag 12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.7982 of 2022, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 5.12.2022.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the counsel for the petitioner was engaged in another

Patna High Court MJC No.9 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2025 2/2 Court, he could not appear when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file. 3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 7982 of 2022 to its original file.

4.

The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U