Arvind Sahani @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9528 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2025 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== Arvind Sahani @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Sahani S/o Tarun Sahani R/o vill - ward no 12, Haripur ghat, P.S. - Khanpur, Distt.- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 arising out of Rosera P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 317(5), 109 and 132 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 8, 20(b) (ii) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, 200 grams of Ganja and three live cartridges were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9528 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that the alleged recovery of ganja is less than commercial quantity. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.01.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of nineteen cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned trial court and shall mark his weekly attendance at Rosera P.S. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Class, Samastipur in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 arising out of Rosera P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T