Kulo Yadav @ Kudip Yadav @ Kuldip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1873 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-214 Year-2024 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Kulo Yadav @ Kudip Yadav @ Kuldip Yadav Son of Govind Yadav Resident of Village - Bamuara, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai 2.
Ramji Yadav @ Ramjee Prasad Yadav Son of Govind Yadav Resident of Village - Bamuara, P.S. - Halsi, District - Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 303(2), 329(4), 109, 3(5) of the BNS Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners after some argument seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.1 Kulo Yadav @ Kudip Yadav @ Kuldip Yadav.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. It is next submitted that petitioner no.2 is a person with clean antecedent and is alleged to have assaulted Mithilesh
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1873 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2025 2/3 with Khanti causing injury on head. It is also submitted that the occurrence had taken place on account of dispute relating to land, in which, both side assaulted each other. It is further submitted that injury report of Mithilesh is not on record. On query of the Court from the learned APP that as to why the injury report is not on record, on which, the learned APP after perusing the case diary submits that at Para-73 it is recorded that Mithilesh was referred to Sadar Hospital for treatment but he never went to Sadar Hospital for getting treated, on which, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this amply demonstrates that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that if Mithilesh would have been injured in that event he definitely would have got treated at Sadar Hospital.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Lakhisarai, in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No.214/2024, subject to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1873 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2025 3/3 conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T