← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/16/2022disposed

Rewul Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-19Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.16 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4580 of 2021 ====================================================== Rewul Khatoon Wife of Late Hanif Ansari Resident of Village- Behara, Police Station-Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

Sri Ameet Kumar Son of not known at present posted as Collector, Madhubani.

3.

Sri Shiv Kumar Pandit Son of not known At present posted as Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Benipatti, Madhubani. 4.

Smt. Sushila Kumari Gupta Daughter of Not Known At present posted as Circle Officer, Benipatti, Madhubani.

5.

Sri Ashok Kumar Mandal Son of Not Known At present posted as SubDivisional Police Officer, Benipatti, Madhubani. 6.

Sri Arvind Kumar Son of Not Known At present posted as Officer-inCharge, Benipatti, Madhubani. 7.

Md. Mumtaz Son of Md. Munsif Resident of Village- Behta, Police StationBenipatti, District- Madhubani. 8.

Saida Khatoon Wife of Moziful Rahman Resident of Village- Behta, Police Station- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

9.

Ataur Rahman Son of Late Hanif Anshari Resident of Village- Behta, Police Station- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2024 In order to show that the order of this Court dated 15.04.2021 passed in CWJC No. 4580 of 2021 has been complied with, a show cause has been filed by the contemnors wherein an order dated 08.01.2024/09.01.2024 has been annexed,

Patna High Court MJC No.16 of 2022(5) dt.19-01-2024 2/2 which has been passed by the District Magistrate, Madhubani.

2.

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to take recourse to the due process of law for redressal of her subsisting grievances, in view of the fact that one title suit is pending consideration pertaining to the disputed land in question. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U