Nagendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1193 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2022 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Nagendra Kumar S/O Dhirendra Kumar R/O Village - Mohiuddinpur, Pethiyapar, P.S- Nagar Nausa, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K., Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No. 367 of 2022 for the offence registered under sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 20.04.2022, while he was on duty near four lane, got information that 5 to 6 persons have gathered to loot the motorcycle and the collection money of the finance company. This followed the movement on the said place, three persons were apprehended while rest managed to escape. They were Shivdani Kumar, Sonu Sharma and Akash Kumar who gave the name of the persons who escaped, the petitioner included. One country made pistol was recovered from Sonu Sharma while
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1193 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 live cartridges and mobile from Shivdani Kumari and they confessed to have planned to commit the crime. This led to the FIR.
4. Though learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no recovery and only on the name given by the accused persons, his name has cropped up in the FIR, learned APP submits that the matter is of the year 2022, the petitioner chose to evade arrest for more than three years and now has preferred anticipatory bail.
5. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the delayed approaching the Court, it would be appropriate that he seek bail.
6. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T