Piyush Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5974 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -434 Year- 2014 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Piyush Kumar, S/O Suchit Sharma, Resident of vill - Karauta, P.SParasbigha, Distt Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. K. Khare (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 15-04-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner was refused bail by the order dated 12.1.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. 955 of 2015 but has been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Annexure-2 reveals that now charges have been framed. Considering such aspect of the matter, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 434 of 2014, subject to the conditions, (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5974 of 2015 (2) dt.15-04-2015 2/2 how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

In the meanwhile, the Trial Court is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 434 of 2014, to the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad, and the Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad, is directed to ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T