Gurudeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.21 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2019 Thana- SC/ST District- Banka ====================================================== GURUDEO YADAV Son of Late Sitabi Yadav Resident of Village - Kishanpur, P.S.- Rajoun, Distt - Banka.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Vibhakar Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sadanand Paswan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 18.11.2019 in G.R.No.85 of 2019, Banka SC/ST P.S.Case No.24 of 2019 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-1, Banka, registered under Sections 341,323,420,406,504,506,34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r)(g) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
The FIR reveals that property dispute between the cosharers is the reason behind the allegation of commission of assault etc.
Considering the background of allegation, let the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.21 of 2020(4) dt.17-02-2020 2/2 appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case and also the appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the learned Trial Court, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T