Geeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2863 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-414 Year-2025 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

Geeta Devi Wife of Arjun Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

2.

Asha Devi Wife of Om Prakash Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

3.

Raju Swarnkar Son of Arjun Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

4.

Om Prakash Swarnkar Son of Arjun Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

5.

Manti Swarnkar @ Vijay Swarnkar Son of Arjun Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura. 6.

Arjun Swarnkar Son of Late Fagu Swarnkar R/o Village - Rampur, Ward No. 9, P.S. - Murliganj, Distt. - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State,

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 303(2), 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the first information report is that the accused persons along with 4 to 5 unknown persons came variously armed and indulged in abuse and assault.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are general and omnibus allegations in the FIR and the same has been lodged after a delay of 3 days for which no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2863 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 explanation has been tendered. It has also been submitted that a title appeal is pending between the parties and there is also a counter case from the petitioners' side. The injuries also indicate that they are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact there is general and omnibus allegation coupled with the fact that there is land dispute and the injuries being simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, who have no criminal antecedent, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Murliganj P.S. Case No. 414 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T