← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2488/2022dismissed

Jitu Nat @ Jitu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-21Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2488 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2021 Thana- MEHANDIA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== JITU NAT @ JITU KUMAR, Son of Bindar Nat @ Ram Binod Nat @ Ram Vinod Nat, Resident of Village - Balidad Nat Bigha, P.S.- Mehandia, DistrictArwal. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramesh Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Mehandia P.S. Case No. 148 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2488 of 2022(2) dt.21-02-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T