Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6554 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6554 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2016 Thana -NAUGACHHIYA RAIL P.S. District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar, Son of Ram Vilash Gupta, Resident of Village- Fulwariya, P.S.- Barauni, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 14.10.2016 in connection with Naugachhiya Rail P.S. Case No. 28 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with theft of the informant's purse containing various articles and cash while travelling on train. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner who claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Railway, Naugachhiya, District Khagaria, in connection with Naugachhiya Rail P.S. Case No. 28 of 2016, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6554 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017 similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T