Dr. Rajiv Kamal Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5482 of 2018 ====================================================== Dr. Rajiv Kamal Srivastava, Son of Late Dharmdeo Prasad Sinha, Resident of Mohall-Shivpur, P.O.-Mahendru, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department, of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

4. The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

5. The Finance Officer, Magadh University Bodh Gaya, Gaya.

6. The Principal, B.D. College, Mithapur, Patna-800001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to GP27 For the University :

Mr. Arbind Nath Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as the University.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for payment of difference of salary for the period January, 2006 to May, 2016 on account of revision of pay of Readers/Associate Professors. The University should examine the recommendation as contained in Annexures 9 and 10 of the college in the matter of determination of arrears of difference of salary on account of revision of pay.

In the aforesaid circumstances, the writ petition is

Patna High Court CWJC No.5482 of 2018(2) dt.03-04-2018 2/2 disposed of with a direction to the Registrar, Magadh University, respondent No. 4 to examine the claim of the petitioner for payment of difference of salary for the period January, 2006 to May, 2016 objectively in the light of Annexures 9 and 10 to the writ petition, if not already decided, within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

It is needless to state here that at the time of determination of such entitlement, the respondent-University will see that the entire monetary benefits arising out of such determination must reach to the petitioner within a further period of 30 days from the date of decision of the Registrar. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U