← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14660/2024bail granted

Sohan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14660 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-340 Year-2019 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Sohan Rai Son of Samrup Lal Rai R/o Mohalla - Mainpura Kharanja Road, P.S - Danapur, District Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This application, for grant of regular bail, arises out of Danapur Police Station Case No. 340 of 2023 dated 01.05.2019, disclosing offences under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution story, the marriage of the informant's daughter was solemnized with the son of the petitioner about six years ago. After marriage, the petitioner along with other accused persons started demanding Rs. 5 lacs as dowry from the daughter of the informant and due to non-fulfillment of demand, informant's daughter was tortured and subsequently killed and her dead body was cremated secretly by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14660 of 2024(3) dt.12-07-2024 2/3 petitioner and others.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of general and omnibus allegation of demand of dowry and torture. The husband of the deceased, namely Mukesh Kumar has been acquitted by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2020 vide judgment dated 27.02.2021.

5. The petitioner is in custody since 17.11.2022.

6. Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and is in custody since 17.11.2022 and the husband has been acquitted in the trial, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount, each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge VI, Danapur, in connection to the Danapur Police Station Case No. 340 of 2023 dated 01.05.2019, disclosing offences under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

8. This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14660 of 2024(3) dt.12-07-2024 3/3 present themselves before the Court, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) HarshPandey/- U T