← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8453/2015bail granted

Anugrah Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-04Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8453 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2014 Thana -BHABHUA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Anugrah Narayan Singh Son of Late Thaga Singh (Retired Head Master of Primary School Bagaicha), Resident of village - Marujhia, P.S. Nasriganj, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. U.S.P.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since 29.8.2014 and the entire case is based on documentary evidence which has already been collected and he has fair antecedents, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua (Kaimur) in connection with Bhabua (Sonhan) P.S. Case No.14 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8453 of 2015 (2) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.