Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1873 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-381 Year-2025 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Rinku Devi W/O- Raj Kumar Nishad @ Raj Kumar Kewat Resident of Village- Chakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 2.

Savita Devi @ Babita Devi W/O- Late Bharat Kewat @ Bharat Nishad, Resident of Village- Chakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 3.

Kiran Devi @Kiran Kumari W/O- Rajesh Chaudhary @ Rajesh Kewat Resident of Village- Chakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 4.

Ganesh @ Ganesh Kumar S/O- Jitendra Chaudhari Resident of VillageChakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 5.

Suraj Kumar S/O- Bharat Kewat Resident of Village- Chakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 6.

Gunjan Kumar S/O- Raj Kumar Kewat Resident of Village- Chakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 7.

Durga @ Durga Kumar S/O-Raj Kumar Kewat Resident of VillageChakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji 8.

Luv Kush @ Luv Kush Kumar S/O- Late Bharat Kewat Resident of VillageChakmath, P.S.- Tekari, Distt.- Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1873 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 2/3

3. As per F.I.R., on 19.08.2025 at about 7:30 PM, all the named accused persons including these petitioners, armed with lathi & iron rod, entered the house of informant and assaulted him & other family members, causing injuries to them. It is further alleged that accused persons also snatched locket from informant's daughter-in-law and took out out cash from the house of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that allegation of assault is general & omnibus and no specific overt act has alleged against these petitioners. As a matter of fact, both parties are next door neighbours and due to petty dispute, altercation took place between them. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - VI, Gaya Ji, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 381 of 2025, subject to condition as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1873 of 2026(2) dt.29-01-2026 3/3 laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T