Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25223/2016bail granted

Sri Ram Lakhan Sah @ Ram Lakhan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-09Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25223 of 2016 (4) dt.09-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25223 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -163 Year- 2016 Thana -SUPAUL District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Sri Ram Lakhan Sah @ Ram Lakhan Sah, Son of Late Bhia Lal Sah, resident of Supaul Ward No. 26, Police Station & District-Supaul. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Supaul P.S.Case No.163 of 2016 registered for an offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.

As per the prosecution case, it is alleged by the informant that the informant being the Block Supply Officer and on raid, the informant apprehended the petitioner with black marketing of kerosene oil and recovered kerosene oil behind Chandra Takiz.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2016. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25223 of 2016 (4) dt.09-08-2016 has been submitted in the case. Petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. while making the necessary seizure. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S.Case No.163 of 2016.

(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T