Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 506 of 2019 ====================================================== Sushila Devi wife of Dharmendra Kumar Resident of Village-Gayghat,P.S. Sasaram,Distt.-Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar I.C.D.S. Nideshalay Indira Bhawan 2nd. Flo 3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram 4.

The District Programme Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram Rohtas 5.

The Child Development Priyojana Officer, Sasaram Rohtas 6.

The Lady Supervisior Department of I.C.D.s. Panchayat Karwandia P.O. Karwandia P.S. Sasaram, Distt.- 7.

Rinki Devi @ Rinku Devi Wife of Anil Kumar Prajapati Resident of VillageGayghat,P.S. Sasaram,Distt.-Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jai Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Md.Raisul Haque -Sc10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-07-2019 Heard the parties.

Petitioner's counsel submits that appeal no. 5 of 2018 filed by the petitioner against the order dated 08.07.2018 passed by the District Programme Officer is pending consideration before the Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. The short submission is that the Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram be directed to dispose of the appeal. Having regard to the short submission and limited prayer made by the petitioner's counsel, consideration has to be

Patna High Court CWJC No. 506 of 2019(2) dt.25-07-2019 2/2 done by the Collector. Pendency of the instant proceeding would thus be futile.

Accordingly, this writ application disposed of with a direction to respondent no.3 that if the appeal has not been disposed of, the same be done by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. The concerned authority is directed to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner expeditiously without undue delay preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) A.K.V./ S. Katyayan/- U