Raj Kishor Rai @ Raj Kishor Ray And ORS v. Rajendra Rai @ Rajindra Rai And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.705 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kishor Rai @ Raj Kishor Ray and Ors 2.

Shiyadhar Rai @ Shiyadhar Rai 3.

Vijay Rai @ Vijay Kumar Rai 4.

Ajay Rai All Sons of Late Ram Nath Rai @ Late Ramnath Ray resident of village Baheuli, Post Chansi Police Station Sahar, District - Bhojpur, Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Rajendra Rai @ Rajindra Rai and Ors 2.

Birendra Kumar Rai 3.

Binod Kumar Rai All sons of Late Shiv Govind Rai residents of village - Banauli, post Chansi Police Station Sahar, District Bhojpur, Ara. 4.

Satyendra Rai 5.

Pramod Rai both sons of Ram Govind Rai both residents of villae Banauli, Post Chandi, P.S. Sahar, District Bhojpur, Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Nath Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Maya Shankar Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2022 Heard both the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to produce the notification or any other documents to show that consolidation proceedings was ever initiated in the village/locality.

In that view of the matter the contention of petitioner that the suit has abated under Section 4C of the Consolidation Act is not tenable.

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.705 of 2018(5) dt.05-12-2022 2/2 Accordingly, I do not find any infirmities in the impugned order. Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez/Ashwani U