Satyendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2094 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-445 Year-2022 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== SATYENDRA PASWAN SON OF MOTI PASWAN R/O VILLAGEKHIRIYAWAN, P.S.- MADANPUR, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-02-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case no.445 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable under sections 342, 294, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner, who is the Principal of Anjanwa State Middle School, is said to have molested and misbehaved with the daughter of informant and two other girls of the said school. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. He further submits that it is apparent from para-28 of the case diary that the victim girls and their parents have denied to undergo medical

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2094 of 2023(2) dt.09-02-2023 2/2 examination. The informant alongwith victim girls and their parents have filed an informatory application in connection with instant case stating therein that female teachers have conspired and instituted a false case against the petitioner by alluring the said minor girls. He further submits that the petitioner is suspended from his duties in the said school and has been transferred to another place. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T