Mukesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2011 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2021 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MUKESH SAHNI Son of Mahesh Shani Resident of Village- Gauda, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Mahesh Sahni Son of Late Rajrup Sahni Resident of Village- Gauda, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Champa Devi @ Jagiya Devi Wife of Mahesh Sahni Resident of VillageGauda, P.S.- Paroo, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

According to the prosecution case, petitioners being armed with Lathi Danda and Farsa came at the door of the informant and brutally assaulted his father, namely, Rameshwar Sahni who succumbed to the injury on the spot. It is further alleged that accused persons had committed murder of his father owing to land dispute.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2011 of 2022(4) dt.10-11-2022 2/2 case. He submits that there is between the parties. He submits that petitioner no.2 (aged about 71 years) is the father and petitioner no.3(aged about 72 years) is the mother of the petitioner no.1. He submits that post-mortem of the deceased was conducted on 16.05.2021 at 10:30 am thereafter the FIR was lodged on 17.05.2021. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Paroo P.S. Case No. 162 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T