Manish Kumar Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.75 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16440 of 2024 ====================================================== Manish Kumar Tiwary, son of Devasharan Tiwari, resident of Village- Haluar Tiwari Tola, P.S.- Sidhwalia, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Vinay Kumar S/O Not Known, The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

Shri Arvind Kumar Chaudhary s/o Not Known The Principal Secretory, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar 4.

Prashant Kumar C.H. S/O Not Known The District Magistrate cum chairman, District Selection Committee, Gopalganj, Bihar. 5.

Awadhesh Dixit S/o Not Known The Superintendent of Police, DistrictGoplaganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-06-2026 Heard Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, learned Advocate for the petitioner, Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned Advocate for the State.

2. The present application has been filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court dated 28.10.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 16440 of 2024.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that despite the order having been passed by this Court to consider the representation of the petitioner preferably within a period of six weeks in the light of the judgment passed by this Court in

Patna High Court MJC No.75 of 2025(5) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 C.W.J.C. No. 159 of 2018 and other analogous cases, the same has not been considered in accordance with law by the concerned District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

4. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State taking this Court through the averments made in the show-cause affidavit and the reasoned order dated 10.02.2025, as contained in Memo no. 182, submitted that the case of the petitioner was duly considered and on being found him ineligible, the claim for inclusion of his name in the final merit list has been rejected.

5. Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the show cause affidavit as well as the order passed by the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, this Court does not find any reason or occasion to continue with the present proceeding, accordingly, the same stands closed.

6. However, if the petitioner is any how aggrieved with the reasoned order passed by the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, he has remedy available under the law. (Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U