Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3773 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-920 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Bablu Kumar @ Bablu Singh Son of Sanjay Singh R/o Village - Gangajal Tola, P.S. - Sonepur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. 2.
Satyendra Rai @ Satendra Rai Son of Rambadan Rai R/o Village - Gangajal Tola, P.S. - Sonepur, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 has antecedent of seven cases, out of which three cases are under the Excise Act and petitioner no.2 has antecedent of six cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 170 litres of liquor from four breweries near bank of Ganga river along with 1000 litres of raw material which was destroyed at the spot. It is next submitted that petitioners were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3773 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and is accessible to villager at large and they came to be implicated based on secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone. It is also submitted that since the petitioners have antecedent as such the police in a mechanical manner implicated and the petitioners are in custody since 17.12.2025.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No.920/2024.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T