← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13474/2024allowed

Sama Parveen @ Parveen Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-01Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13474 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2022 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sama Parveen @ Parveen Singh W/o Sukhbir Singh @ Subir Singh R/o House No. 526, Street No. 2, Guru Tej Bahadur Nagar, Near Children Valley, Mundian Lalan, P.S.- Jamalpur, District- Ludhiana, Punjab, 141015 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-03-2024 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) & 22 of the N.D.P.S Act.

3. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that prior to the present petition the petitioner had moved this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 65136 of 2022, whereby her petition was dismissed with an observation that if the trial is not concluded within a period of one year, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew her prayer for bail. He further submits that the trial has not concluded within the stipulated time and not even single witness has been examined. Hence, the Petitioner, vide

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13474 of 2024(2) dt.01-03-2024 2/3 present application, has renewed his prayer for bail.

4. Ld. APP for the State opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the fact that the trial has not yet been concluded, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, above named, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hazipur, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 132 of 2022 on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or noncooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required.

(iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13474 of 2024(2) dt.01-03-2024 3/3 (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedent, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent despite his knowledge of the same. (v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding the previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. Court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J) chandan/- U T