Devendra Kumar Pandey @ Baba @ Devendra Pandey v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25123 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2015 Thana -KASHICHAK District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Devendra Kumar Pandey @ Baba @ Devendra Pandey aged about 30 Years Son of: Anirudh Pandey, resident of Village: Adarsh Nagar, Tilaiya, PS. Tilaiya, District Koderma (Jharkhand).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.D.Singh Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-07-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the period of custody and the undertaking of the wife of the Petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Kashichak P.S. Case No.06 of 2015, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor shall be the wife of the Petitioner and the other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25123 of 2016 (4) dt.12-07-2016 2/2 petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T