Parsuram Yadav @ Mukhiya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15426 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2014 Thana -DINARA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Parsuram Yadav @ Mukhiya Yadav Son of Sri Ram Chandra Yadav Resident of village - Bodh Chater, P.S. Dawath, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dinara P.S. Case No. 29 of 2014 for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, in brief, as narrated in the written report of one Nirmal Kumar Azad, is that while he was returning from Sasaram after taking training of his wife by Motor Cycle on 8-2-2014 at 6 P.M. , six unknown persons riding on two motorcycles surrounded them near Baradhi Canal and on the point of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15426 of 2015 (2) dt.08-06-2015 2 / 2 gun snatched mobile phone etc. , and when the villagers surrounded then the culprits fled away leaving their motor-cycles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Further, it has been submitted that neither the petitioner has been put on T.I. Parade nor there is any recovery of incriminating article from the possession of the petitioner.
On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner has got three criminal cases against him. The petitioner is in custody since 6-2-2015.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. Anyhow, the petitioner, if so advised, may move this Court for bail after completion of one year in custody.
(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Roy/- U T