Shahina Perween @ Shahina Parween v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.701 of 2024 ====================================================== Shahina Perween @ Shahina Parween Wife of Md. Ali Resident of VillageSerukahi Post Kabilpur Police Station-Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Education Officer, District-Muzaffarpur. 4.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District-Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 6.

The Block Development Officer-Cum-Secretary, Block Employment Committee, Block-Minapur, District-Muzaffarpur. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Block-Minapur, Distirct-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Uday Prasad, AC to GP- 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition is squarely covered by the Full Bench judgment dated 20.03.2024 passed in L.P.A. No. 748 of 2022.

3. In such view of the matter, petitioner is directed to file a fresh detailed representation before the District Programme Officer, Establishment, Muzaffarpur (respondent no.4) along with all supporting judgments and documents within a period of two weeks and the respondent no.4 is well advised to

Patna High Court CWJC No.701 of 2024 dt.29-03-2024 2/2 consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4. Needless to state that respondent no. 4 shall be solely liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 30.03.2024 Transmission Date NA