Pankaj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2582 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2018 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui ====================================================== Pankaj Paswan Late Prakash Paswan Resident of village Kakan PS Jamui District Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The state of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged in his fardbeyan that while his son was sleeping on the verandah outside the shop on 07.08.2018 and he returned to his house then while sleeping he was killed by firearm by unknown persons. FIR is against unknown. During investigation, name of petitioner has surfaced in this case and he has been implicated in this case on the basis of self confession, except self confession and confession made by co-accused there is no any other incriminating material against petitioner. Petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2582 of 2019(2) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Jamui, in connection with Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 304 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T