Ranjeet Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12566 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2016 Thana- JAYRAMPUR District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== RANJEET CHAUDHARY S/o Navin Chaudhary R/o Village- Badhanpura, P.S.- Jairampur, District- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 03-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302, 328 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegations in the FIR, the daughter of the informant was married to the petitioner in the year 2012. It is stated that at 6 pm he heard from the co-villagers that the accused persons including the petitioner herein had beaten up his daughter and poisoned her as a result of which she died in the doctor's clinic.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations as levelled in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12566 of 2021(3) dt.03-08-2021 2/2 FIR are false and concocted. From the FIR itself it would be evident that the deceased was taken to the doctor's clinic for treatment but she could not survive. In the postmortem report no external or internal injury has been found on the body of the deceased. Other co-accused have been enlarged on bail. The petitioner is in custody since 13.1.2020 and has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the material that has transpired during course of investigation it transpires that in the inquest report the cause of death is stated to be beating up and administering poison to the deceased. Further the witnesses whose statement have been recorded in paragraph nos. 8, 9, 10 and 25 of the case diary have supported the allegations in the FIR.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U