Manmohan Prasad Sharma And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9870 of 2008 ======================================================
1. Manmohan Prasad Sharma S/O Late Tridip Narayan Sharma, resident of Mohalla- Bicha Gaon, P.S. Kasim Bazar, District- Munger.
2. The Joint Proprietor, Manmohan Prasad Sharma, M/S Tridip and Company (Gun Manufacture Company), Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna.
3. The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority its Regional Office, Bhagalpur.
4. The District Magistrate, Munger.
5. The Regional Incharge, Industrial Prangan, Munger.
6. The Special Officer Municipal, Munger.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Respondent No.1 & 4 : Mr. RatnakarAmbastha, AC to GP-13 For the Respondent No.2,3 &5: Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2015 Heard the parties.
In compliance of the previous order, a supplementary counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2, 3 and 5. In the aforesaid supplementary counter-affidavit, resolution dated 23.01.2015 of the Board of Directors of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna (In short 'BIADA') has been brought on record as Annexure-B.
In view of the aforesaid resolution dated 23.01.2015, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority for grant of appropriate reliefs.
Permission is accorded.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9870 of 2008 (16) dt.06-04-2015 2/2 The present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
It goes without saying that if the petitioner files any representation in the light of the aforesaid resolution dated 23.01.2015 (Annexure-B to the aforesaid supplementary counteraffidavit), the competent authority shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U