Navlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2751 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== NAVLESH KUMAR Son of Lalo Yadav R/v- Madho Bigha, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
RINKU KUMARI Wife of Navlesh Kumar R/v- Madho Bigha, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nalanda , at present r/v- Pathra English, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Shankar Kumar For the State :
Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehend his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have assaulted, tortured and ousted her from the matrimonial home on non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that opposite party no.2 never visited the house of the petitioner and there was no relationship of husband and wife between them. It is further submitted that earlier to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2751 of 2023(3) dt.21-08-2023 2/2 case under hand informant/opposite party no.2 has lodged a complaint case before the learned C.J.M., Nawada, bearing Complaint Case No.1366/2019, against the petitioner and his family members in which cognizance had been taken on 05.03.2020. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No.20 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T