Nageshwar Mistri v. Dilip Upadhayay And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.688 of 2018 ====================================================== Nageshwar Mistri Son of Ramchandra Sharma, Resident of Village-Uchauli, P.O. Regania, P.S. Madanpur, District-Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Dilip Upadhayay and Ors Son of Ganesh Upadhyay, Resident of VillageUchauli, P.O. Regania, P.S. Madanpur, District-Aurangabad. 2.

Ganesh Upadhayay Son of Late Brij Mohan Upadhyay, Resident of VillageUchauli, P.O. Regania, P.S. Madanpur, District-Aurangabad. 3.

Umesh Upadhyay Son of Ganesh Upadhyay, Resident of Village-Uchauli, P.O. Regania, P.S. Madanpur, District-Aurangabad. 4.

Awadhesh Upadhyay Son of Ganesj Upadhyay, Resident of Village-Uchauli, P.O. Regania, P.S. Madanpur, District-Aurangabad. 5.

Sarita Devi Wife of Mithilesh Pathak (Daughter of Ganesh Upadhyay), Resident of Village-Bhairopur, P.S. Rishiup, District-Aurangabad. 6.

Mamta Devi Wife of Amaranjan Pandey (Daughter of Ganesh Upadhyay), Resident of Village-Jaipur, P.S. Mali, District-Aurangabad. 7.

Prem Lata Devi Wife of Chandan Mishra (Daughter of Ganesh Upadhyay) Resident of Mohalla-Satyendra Nagar,Aurangabad,P.S. Aurangabad. District-Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinay Mistry For the Respondent/s :

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2022 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. Permission is granted.

This application stands dismissed as withdrawn. Later on:- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit is for partition and evidence of both the parties has now been

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.688 of 2018(2) dt.28-07-2022 2/2 closed and the suit is fixed for argument on 04.08.2022. He further submits that the suit is of 2014 as such, the learned trial court may be directed to dispose the suit on its merit as early as possible.

Taking into consideration the aforesaid submissions, the learned trial court is requested to dispose the Partition Suit No. 56 of 2014 / 332 of 2015 expeditiously without granting unnecessary adjournments to the parties.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U